BHP holds back from new mega‑deals amid surge in copper demand
Subscribe to our free newsletter today to keep up to date with the latest mining and minerals news.
BHP is stepping away from large‑scale mergers and acquisitions as the global mining giant sharpens its focus on internal copper growth and navigates a transition in leadership. The move comes as rivals consolidate and copper prices climb, testing the strategic patience of a company often at the forefront of sector‑defining deals.
The Australian miner is notably staying on the sidelines following the announcement of a $53 billion merger between Anglo American and Teck Resources, a deal that will create one of the largest copper producers in the world. For now, BHP appears content to grow from within rather than chase another contested acquisition.
A market defined by copper
Global demand for copper is surging as the energy transition accelerates. Used heavily in electric vehicles, renewable energy systems and grid infrastructure, copper has become central to decarbonisation efforts worldwide. According to the International Energy Agency, copper demand could double by 2040, placing immense pressure on miners to increase supply in a market already showing signs of scarcity.
Supply risks are amplified by the geographical concentration of copper production. Chile and Peru account for over 35 percent of global output, and recent political uncertainty and operational disruptions in both countries have added volatility to global markets. Meanwhile, new copper discoveries have slowed, and permitting hurdles remain steep in most jurisdictions.
These dynamics have sparked a wave of strategic activity as miners seek to position themselves for the long cycle ahead. The Anglo‑Teck deal, combining deep reserves with complementary geographic footprints, is the most ambitious consolidation effort since the Glencore‑Xstrata tie‑up in 2013.
Why BHP Is stepping back
BHP has made clear it no longer sees value in bidding for Anglo American or Teck Resources. After being rejected three times in its $49 billion approach for Anglo last year, the company has shifted toward less headline‑grabbing but arguably more cost‑efficient growth initiatives.
Instead of acquiring new assets outright, BHP has committed over $2 billion to expand its exposure to copper through brownfield developments and smaller stakes. The miner increased its holdings in Argentina’s Josemaria copper project through a stake in Lundin Mining, while also driving output growth at Chile’s Escondida mine, the world’s largest copper operation.
Speaking on an August earnings call, CEO Mike Henry emphasized that M&A is not the only path to scale. “Frankly in current markets, it’s hard to see the right combination of the commodities that we like, the asset quality that we like, at a price where we can still unlock attractive value for BHP shareholders,” he said.
That comment echoed a broader view among major investors that disciplined capital allocation, particularly during commodity upswings, is preferable to expensive acquisitions. While the Anglo‑Teck merger may eventually prove accretive, it carries significant integration risk and political exposure, especially given Teck’s Canadian roots and Anglo’s legacy South African ties.
Shifting priorities and leadership transitions
BHP’s strategy is also shaped by internal dynamics. Chair Ross McEwan took over in March, and CEO Mike Henry is nearing the end of a typical six‑year term. A potential leadership transition introduces a layer of caution, especially with the board focused on continuity and risk management.
Analysts suggest that the firm’s immediate priority is stability and performance delivery, rather than transformative deals that could unsettle operational focus. There is also a recognition that mega‑deals attract regulatory scrutiny and rarely deliver immediate value. BHP’s experience with past mergers, including the complex integration of Billiton in 2001, offers lessons in patience.
Still, few are ruling out a future move if the Anglo‑Teck combination underperforms or if market conditions change. Industry bankers note that with the deal expected to take up to 18 months to complete, BHP retains the option to act later, particularly if valuations shift or integration falters.
Implications for the mining landscape
BHP’s strategic restraint could signal a broader shift in the mining and minerals industry, one that favors focused growth over aggressive consolidation. With capital costs rising and environmental expectations increasing, miners may lean more heavily on organic expansion, innovation and long‑term portfolio planning.
As capital expenditure returns to the forefront of boardroom discussions, companies that can deliver volume and margin growth without stretching balance sheets may outperform. Investors are also pushing for clearer links between strategy and shareholder returns, especially in sectors where commodity cycles remain unpredictable.
Sources