Trump’s Second Term and the Future of US Mining
Donald Trump’s return to the White House in 2024 has major implications for US mining. With a Republican majority in the Senate, Trump’s policies are expected to reinforce protectionist, pro-domestic industry shifts, affecting environmental regulation, trade, and mining permits. These policies are aimed at strengthening US mineral supply chains and reducing foreign reliance, especially in critical minerals essential to renewable energy and technology sectors.
A Republican majority will likely support Trump’s vision, prioritizing reshoring over international alliances. However, his environmental deregulation and potential adjustments to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) could present both opportunities and challenges for industry players navigating these changes.
A focus on reshoring mineral production
A central pillar of Trump’s policy is reshoring, or moving mineral production back to US soil, a departure from the previous administration’s focus on ‘nearshoring’ and ‘friendshoring’. Trump’s administration aims to build up the entire mineral supply chain domestically to reduce reliance on imports, especially from China.
Gregory Wischer, founder of Dei Gratia Minerals, anticipates that Trump’s administration will prioritize expanding US-based extraction, processing, and refining capabilities. This approach would likely include streamlined permitting processes and targeted tariffs aimed at incentivizing domestic mineral production, aligning with Trump’s broader focus on strengthening America’s mineral supply chain.
While reshoring could create jobs and strengthen supply chains, it will require significant infrastructure to scale extraction and processing capabilities, as the US currently lacks China’s extensive production capacity. Grace Fan of GlobalData TS Lombard cautions that this reshoring focus may slow international mining partnerships started under the previous administration, though the move aligns with Trump’s broader goal of US industrial independence.
Environmental deregulation and mining permitting reform
Trump’s approach to environmental regulation is expected to relax standards that affect mining, making it faster and easier to get new projects approved. For instance, Trump has already proposed overturning a 20-year mining moratorium in northern Minnesota, an area rich in mineral resources. His previous administration also encouraged regulatory reform to expand uranium mining on federal lands—a stance expected to extend to other minerals.
Hugues Jacquemin, CEO of Northern Graphite, expects that Trump’s pro-mining stance will result in faster permitting and more mines in production. A recent poll by Mining Technology supports this, with 56% of respondents believing a Republican administration would accelerate mine licensing.
Eased regulations will appeal to industry leaders eager for growth but raise environmental concerns. Supporters argue that streamlined permitting is vital for a competitive minerals market, though environmental advocates warn of potential ecological harm from reduced oversight.
Tariff expansions and US-China mineral decoupling
Tariffs remain one of Trump’s primary tools for boosting US industries. His first term saw the beginning of a ‘decoupling’ strategy with China, imposing tariffs on Chinese goods, including critical minerals. Trump’s second term will likely continue this trend, perhaps increasing tariffs on imported minerals essential to sectors like EV batteries.
Currently, China controls about 77% of global graphite production, creating an imbalance Trump aims to address. Clarice Brambilla, energy transition analyst at GlobalData, expects that the ongoing US-China decoupling will continue along its current trajectory, with high tariffs aimed at reducing reliance on Chinese imports.
Inflation Reduction Act and energy transition
Another major question surrounding Trump’s second term is the future of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), passed under the previous administration to support clean energy and critical minerals. Though Trump’s policies favor fossil fuels, he may not fully repeal the IRA due to existing investments, especially in Republican-led states. Industry experts also suggest that a Trump administration might scale back specific provisions, like the $7,500 EV tax credit, rather than dismantle the IRA entirely.
Trump’s second term is likely to reshape US mining, with deregulatory policies, tariffs, and reshoring efforts poised to shift the industry’s landscape. While the drive to reduce foreign reliance could stimulate domestic production, short-term costs and environmental concerns present challenges.
In the long run, Trump’s focus on mineral independence and reduced reliance on China could give the US mining sector a stronger competitive edge. However, the effectiveness of this strategy depends on how quickly the industry can expand US-based mining and processing, adapt to new regulations, and manage shifting international trade relations.
Sources: