US puts $2 billion behind critical mineral supply chains
Subscribe to our free newsletter today to keep up to date with the latest mining and minerals news.
The US government is putting more than $2 billion into critical minerals and related manufacturing projects as it seeks to reduce supply risks across defense, energy and advanced manufacturing.
The funding covers projects ranging from mines and mineral processing to battery materials and permanent magnets. It shows that US mineral policy is moving beyond access to raw materials and toward the industrial capacity needed to turn those materials into usable products.
The largest commitment is a $1.4 billion investment in California-based Sila Nanotechnologies. The funding is intended to expand production of silicon-carbon battery anodes and support construction of a lithium-ion battery cell manufacturing facility.
A further $400 million is going to Sunrise Energy Metals to develop a scandium supply chain, including a primary scandium mine. Niron Magnetics will receive $150 million to develop and produce permanent magnets that do not use rare earth materials.
Smaller investments cover bauxite, boron, graphite, tantalum, niobium and rare earths. The government has also announced more than $180 million for mining education and workforce programs, including $100 million for 14 US mining schools.
Together, the projects point to a wider change in how governments view mineral supply chains. The issue is no longer limited to where minerals are mined. Processing, refining, component production and workforce capacity are becoming part of the same industrial policy.
Supply concentration is becoming a manufacturing risk
Demand for many minerals used in batteries, power systems and advanced manufacturing continues to rise, while refining remains concentrated in a small number of countries.
Global battery demand grew by more than 35% in 2025 and passed 1.5 TWh, according to the International Energy Agency. Demand for key energy minerals has grown at close to 10% a year on average in recent years. The energy sector accounted for about 75% of demand growth for those minerals in 2025.
At the same time, the average market share of the largest refining country across key energy minerals reached 70% in 2025, up from 68% in 2020. China remained the leading refiner for most of the minerals covered by the IEA, while Indonesia led nickel refining.
That concentration matters to manufacturers because a mineral can pass through several industrial stages before it reaches a production line.
Mining more material in the US or an allied country does not remove the risk if that material must still be sent elsewhere for refining or conversion into a battery material, magnet or other component.
Recent export controls have shown the commercial effect. The IEA said Chinese restrictions on rare earth exports introduced in April 2025 led some automakers to reduce production or temporarily suspend operations.
For logistics and procurement teams, this changes the definition of supply chain visibility. Knowing the location of a mine is only one part of the picture. Companies also need to know where materials are refined, where intermediate products are made and where alternative capacity exists.
Washington is targeting the middle of the supply chain
The US package is notable because much of the funding is aimed beyond extraction.
Sila’s battery anode project and Niron’s magnet production are examples of investment in manufacturing stages that sit between raw minerals and finished products. Westwater Resources is receiving $25 million for graphite development to support domestic battery manufacturing, while Global Advanced Materials is receiving $25 million for tantalum and niobium used in electronics, magnets and steel.
This matters because diversification plans remain uneven.
The IEA said investment outside dominant suppliers is still weighted toward mining, while refining and downstream production are developing more slowly. In rare earth supply chains, planned refining capacity outside the leading supplier is expected to reach only about two-thirds of projected mine output by 2035. Planned magnet production would amount to only one-third.
That gap could leave manufacturers with more mineral output but too little capacity to turn it into industrial products.
There are early signs that targeted investment can change the picture. New US rare earth refining projects and higher production in Malaysia reduced the leading supplier’s share of rare earth refining from more than 90% in 2023 to 85% in 2025, according to the IEA.
Public funding is also becoming a larger part of the market. The IEA estimates that public finance commitments for critical minerals rose more than fourfold between 2023 and 2025 to $65 billion.
The US announcement fits that pattern. Governments are using loans, investments and other forms of support to help projects move forward when commercial finance may be harder to secure.
Funding will not remove supply risk quickly
The size of the latest US package is significant, but money committed today does not translate into material available to factories tomorrow.
New mines, processing facilities and manufacturing plants can take years to reach full production. Projects must pass technical, financial and construction milestones before they can add meaningful supply.
The investment environment is also difficult. Global critical mineral investment fell 9% in 2025, the first substantial decline since 2020. Spending by companies focused on lithium, nickel and cobalt fell 20%, while lithium specialists reduced investment by about 40%.
That puts more pressure on public funding to help projects survive weak commodity cycles while remaining commercially viable over the long term.
For industrial buyers, the practical effect is likely to be gradual. More domestic and allied capacity could provide additional sourcing options, but companies will still need to manage concentrated supply, long development times and price swings.
The $2 billion announcement matters less as an immediate answer to mineral dependence than as evidence of where US industrial policy is heading. Mining remains part of the strategy, but the focus is widening to the processing plants, battery materials, magnets, skills and manufacturing capacity needed to build a more secure supply chain.
Source
